DEVELOPMENT OF EFFICIENT INDUSTRIAL CROSSBREEDING METHODS IN SHEEP TO MAXIMIZE HETEROSIS EFFECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52578/2305-9397-2025-3-31-44Ключевые слова:
sheep breeding, sheep breed, crossbreeding, Dorper, Suffolk, Edilbay breed, Kazakh fat- tailed coarse-wool breed, heterosisАннотация
The article presents the results of studies on rams of the meat breeds Dorper (in the North Kazakhstan and Abai regions) and Suffolk (in the Abai region) when crossed with ewes of the Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wool and Edilbay breeds. The aim of the study was to investigate the meat productivity and meat quality of crossbred lambs at the age of 4–4.5 months. Additionally, the morphological composition of the carcasses was determined.
It was found that all variants of industrial crossbreeding ensured an improvement in meat productivity indicators compared to purebred animals. In the “Dorper × Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wool” cross, an increase in the proportion of lean meat in the carcass (82.7%), the meat yield coefficient (4.68), and a reduction in fat-tail size were observed. The “Dorper × Edilbay” cross provided the highest lean meat yield (82.9%) and meat yield coefficient (4.86), as well as an improvement in carcass marketability due to the uniform distribution of fat. The use of Suffolk rams on Kazakh fat-tailed coarse-wool ewes led to an increase in carcass yield, lean meat content (81.2%), meat yield coefficient (4.32), and the absence of a fat-tail.
The results confirm that industrial crossbreeding with Dorper and Suffolk rams effectively enhances the meat traits of the offspring, improves the commercial characteristics of the carcasses, and contributes to increased economic efficiency of mutton production.
Библиографические ссылки
On approval of the Concept of development of the agro–industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2021-2030 - IPS "Adilet"
Degen, A.A. (2013). Karakul sheep production in Kazakhstan: an efficient collective enterprise under the state farm (sovkhoz) system and its collapse with the break-up of the Soviet Union. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9:1, 1-9.
Kuleshov, P. N. (1947). Theoretical works on breeding livestock. Moscow: Agricultural Publishing House, 223 p.
Borisenko, E.Ya. (1967). Breeding of farm animals. Moscow: Kolos, 463.6
Stubsjoen, SM. et al. (2011). Assessment of sheep welfare using on-farm registrations and performance data. Animal Welfare, 20(2), 239-251.
Kostylev, M.N., Barysheva, Ms. (2019). Productive and biological indicators of Romanov sheep of different genealogical groups. Sheep, goats, wool business, 3, 24-25. 8
Mekonnen, T., et al. (2024). Exterior Body Characteristics of Indigenous Sheep Populations in Western Zone of Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Research in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 7(2), 134-149.
Manzoor, A., et al. (2019). Physical traits of sheep in Anantnag and Pulwama districts of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, 4(6), 45-50.
Varade, PK, Ali, SZ. (1999). Body measurements of sheep in field conditions. The Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 5, 59-61.
Kumar, S. et al. (2017). Prediction of body weight from linear body measurements in sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52,1263-1266.
Çilek, S., Petkova, M. (2017). Phenotypic correlations between some body measurements and prediction of body weight of malya sheep. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(1), 99-105.
Chirvinsky, NP. (1949). Selected works. Moscow: Selkhozgiz, I, 258.
Bogdanov, EA. (1953). Body types of farm animals and humans and their significance. Moscow: 311.
Kuleshov, Mon. (1937). The choice of the exterior of horses, cattle, sheep and pigs. Moscow: 204.
Ivanov, M. (1964). The exterior of a sheep. Sheep breeding. Complete Collected Works, Moscow: 4, 52-74, 420-510.
Liskun, Eph. (1949). The exterior of farm animals. Moscow: Selkhozgiz, 19 Ivanov, M. (1947). Course of sheep breeding. Moscow: 26-29.
Methodology for assessing sheep meat productivity, Dubrovitsy, 1970, 50 p.
Plokhinsky N.A. Guide to biometrics for animal technicians, Moscow, 1969. 256 p.
Merkuryeva E.K. Biometrics in breeding and genetics of agricultural animals, Moscow, 1970, pp. 16-38.
Methodological recommendations for the study of sheep meat productivity, Moscow, 1978, 45 p.
Methodological guidelines for the study of meat productivity. Moscow, 1965, 24 p.
Methods of studying the fattening and meat qualities of cattle. –M., 1965.-54s.