EVALUATION OF THE PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NATURAL HONEY COLLECTED IN VARIOUS REGIONS OF KAZAKHSTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52578/2305-9397-2025-3-44-52Ключевые слова:
honey quality, reducing sugars, diastase number, acidity, Kazakhstan, natural honeyАннотация
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics of 26 natural honey samples collected from different regions of Kazakhstan. The main objective was to assess honey quality in accordance with GOST 19792–2017 standards and to establish a reliable database that could serve as the foundation for developing organic beekeeping practices in the country. The analysis included the determination of moisture content, reducing sugars, sucrose, free acidity, pH level, and diastase activity.
The results demonstrated that the majority of samples complied with national standards and exhibited attributes of maturity and authenticity. Reducing sugar content ranged from 73.04% to 98.78%, with several samples exceeding the international Codex Alimentarius minimum threshold of 65%, confirming their natural composition. Diastase activity reached up to 33.29 Göthe units, indicating high enzymatic activity and the absence of heat treatment. Nevertheless, certain deviations were observed: in some samples sucrose levels approached the upper permissible limit, while diastase numbers fell below 5 Göthe units, suggesting possible technological impact or prolonged storage. Acidity values (12–46 meq/kg) and pH levels (3.72– 4.74) remained within acceptable ranges, reflecting stable microbiological conditions.
These findings emphasize the importance of regional monitoring of honey quality and support the development of a national certification system for organic honey in Kazakhstan. The results also highlight the export potential of Kazakh honey and demonstrate the capacity of specific regions to produce high- quality, mature, and enzymatically active honey suitable for organic certification
Библиографические ссылки
Ahmed J., Prabhu S. T., Raghavan G. S. V., Ngadi M. Physico-chemical, rheological, calorimetric and dielectric behavior of selected Indian honey // Journal of Food Engineering. — 2007. — T. 79, № 4. — P. 1207–1213. — DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.048.
Bogdanov S., Ruoff K., Oddo L. P. Physico-chemical methods for the characterization of unifloral honeys: A review // Apidologie. — 2004. — T. 35, Suppl. 1. — P. 4–17. — DOI: 10.1051/apido:2004047.
Burmistrov A. N., Nikitina V. A. Medonosnye rastenija i ikh pyl'tsa. — Moskva: Rosagropromizdat, 1990.
da Silva P. M., Gauche C., Gonzaga L. V., Costa A. C. O., Fett R. Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity // Food Chemistry. — 2016. — T. 196. — P. 309–323. — DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.051.
Al-Waili N., Salom K., Al-Ghamdi A., Ansari M. J. Antibiotic, pesticide, and microbial contaminants of honey: Human health hazards // The Scientific World Journal. — 2012. — Article ID 930849. — DOI: 10.1100/2012/930849.
Brandorf A. Flowerspecialization of Apis mellifera L. in north-eastern region of European Part of Russia. — Pulawy, 2008. — P. 130–131.
Aslan C. E., Liang C. T., Galindo B., Kimberly H. T., Walter. The role of honey bees as pollinators in natural areas // Natural Areas Journal. — 2016. — T. 36, № 4. — P. 478–488.
Chauhan M. S., Farooqui A., Trivedi A. Plants foraged by bees for honey production in northern India: The diverse flora of India and its implications for apiculture // Acta Palaeobotanica. — 2017. — T. 57, № 1. — P. 119–132. — DOI: 10.1515/acpa-2017-0003.
Kurmanov R. G. Geograficheskoe i botanicheskoe proiskhozhdenie bashkirskogo meda: Atlas pyl'tsy. — Ufa: Kazennoe predprijatie Respubliki Bashkortostan, Izd-vo «Mir pechati», 2019.
European Commission. Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey // Official Journal of the European Communities. — L10. — P. 47–52.
White J. W. Composition of honey // In: Crane E. (Ed.). Honey: A Comprehensive Survey. — London: Heinemann, 1975. — P. 157–206.
Oddo L. P., Piro R. Main European unifloral honeys: Descriptive sheets // Apidologie. — 2004. — T. 35, Suppl. 1. — P. S38–S81. — DOI: 10.1051/apido:2004049.
AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 21st ed. — Gaithersburg: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2019.
Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. National program for organic agriculture development. — 2022.
Rib R. D. Pchelovodu Kazakhstana. — Ust-Kamenogorsk: Media-Alliance, 2004. — 408 s.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Standard for Honey (CODEX STAN 12-1981, Rev. 1 (1987), Rev. 2 (2001)).
Brandorf A.Z. Florospecializatsiya medonosnykh pchel Kirovskoy oblasti // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. — 2008. — № 4. — S. 61–63.
Nuralieva U. A., Kusainova Zh. A., Moldakhmetova G. A., Yesentureyeva G. Osobennosti prirodno-klimaticheskogo zonirovaniya kormovoy bazy pchelovodstva Almatinskoy oblasti // Izdenister Natigeler. — 2021. — № 4(92). — S. 70–78. — DOI: 10.37884/4-2021/08.
Karpovich I. V. i dr. Atlas pyl'vevykh zёren. — 2015.
Von der Ohe W., Oddo L. P., Piana M. L., Morlot M., Martin P. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology // Apidologie. — 2004.